"[women] derive sexual pleasure from putting up resistance and being overwhelmed"
I got this quote from one of Chikito's recent threads (
http://pualifestyle.com/forum/showth...792.html?t=792) and i agree with the message 100%. When sex is in the air women like to play their "game", which is to resist your advances, pretend they re not easy, etc...
most of the girls that i ve hooked up with at some point said "NO", even though they ended up giving it up anyways.
my usual approach to get over LMR is to bulldoze my way past it, by taking a girl to a level of excitement where she can't object anymore. In good PUA fashion, every thing that i say to her is in the form of a statement, not a question (ie "i wanna be inside of you" instead of "do you want me inside of you?") so she certainly feels overwhelmed.
So, from a PUA point of view, getting laid after being initially told "no" is considered a success. But from a legal point of view, it' s considered... RAPE?
at least in the US, it is so it got me thinking... should i ask the girl for a clear verbal acceptance before i proceed any further? sure, some girls end up saying "fuck me" but with others they either initiate (oral) sex or let me fuck them without adding another word.
could this possibly lead to legal issues in case a girl gets a serious case of buyer's remorse, or she later gets really mad at me for some reason?
overall what do you guys and gals think? is this something that you ever worried about?